This is a reported timeline. Each entry is sourced to the outlet that first published it; quotations are reproduced as those outlets printed them. For our analysis of what it means, see the companion opinion piece, “Chad Smith Finally Spoke — and Made It Worse.”
For three months, the Boston Symphony Orchestra’s leadership said almost nothing. After the March 6 decision not to renew music director Andris Nelsons, CEO Chad Smith and board chair Barbara Hostetter let a single sentence — "not aligned on future vision" — stand in for an explanation, while musicians revolted, peer orchestras protested, and a red-flower campaign filled Symphony Hall.
June was the month the silence broke. It did not calm the crisis. It became the most eventful stretch since the firing itself. Here is what happened, in order.
June 11 — Chad Smith breaks his silence to The New York Times
Smith gave his first substantive interview to The New York Times. He acknowledged the decision had been badly handled — "I probably kept my head down too long in trying to deal with this internally, but I recognize now that these questions are not going away" — and conceded, of the Friday-afternoon mass email that informed musicians of the firing, "It was certainly not our intention for this to be rolled out in this manner."
But he closed the two doors that mattered most. On reinstating Nelsons: "That’s off the table." On resigning: he had no intention of doing so. In the same reporting, Smith said he saw "audiences that are at 55 percent of our hall capacity on multiple nights" — a figure that would be challenged within days — and his former mentor, the veteran administrator Deborah Borda, distanced herself from how he had handled the affair, telling the Times the situation "isn’t serving anybody" and that she was "startled by the bitterness."
June 16 — "Cultural theft in broad daylight"
The Berkshire Eagle published an open letter that reframed the whole dispute in moral terms. Its author, Vera Kelsey-Watts — by her account a third-generation BSO subscriber from Fremont, New Hampshire, whose family has held its Symphony Hall seats for more than 80 years — compared the removal of Nelsons to the most famous art crime in the city’s history.
"On March 18, 1990, thieves walked into the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in the middle of the night and stole masterworks from the people of Boston," she wrote. "Now, Boston is witnessing another cultural theft. This one is also coordinated by the institution’s guardians, but it is happening in broad daylight. Chad Smith and Barbara Hostetter have engineered the removal of Andris Nelsons." Her central claim was about stewardship, not finance: "Art is not a possession. It is a gift held in trust for the public." She closed with a demand that became a rallying cry: "Return what you have taken. Reinstate Andris Nelsons."
June 18 — The "epic battle" interview
The Berkshire Eagle’s Clarence Fanto published an extended interview in which Smith, for the first time, laid out the worldview behind the decision — and braced for a fight over it.
He did not retreat. "The decision that we made rolled out in a really clunky way," he said. "But the decision not to renew Andris’s contract was sound." He defined the mission as expansion: "We have to program diverse artists across diverse genres in order to maximize the number of people who will come," and "I want every eighth grader to feel as connected to the Boston Symphony as they do to the Boston Celtics. That is the goal." He cast the controversy as a war of ideas: "The debate, the epic battle we’re having right now is about a vision for an arts institution and an orchestra to serve more expansively."
He also put fresh numbers on the table: as much as $145 million in deferred maintenance over ten years — a figure he tied largely to Tanglewood, which he framed as roughly half of the orchestra's total capital needs; a 40 percent decline in subscription seats, "from 176,390 tickets" in 2004-05 "to 101,435 in 2023-24"; classical programs reduced from 87 to 66 a year; and a roughly $600 million endowment he described as under strain. Players Committee chair Todd Seeber responded that "management has failed to begin to repair the trust they completely shattered in terminating Nelsons."
June 19 — The World Cup the BSO didn’t play
Helen Brady, a former business director of the Boston Pops, published a guest critique arguing that the orchestra had squandered a once-in-a-generation opportunity: Boston was a host city for the 2026 World Cup, and the BSO, she wrote, chose invisibility during "the city’s biggest global moment."
A "world-class symphony welcoming international delegations during a global tournament is a revenue engine," Brady argued — and management’s preoccupation with the Nelsons crisis, set against the orchestra’s asserted deficit, made the silence worse, not more prudent. "The deficit is exactly why they should have been focused on this," she wrote. "Hiding during the world’s most visible moment is not fiscal responsibility; it is financial suicide."
June 21 — Tanglewood opens, with Nelsons still on the podium
The Tanglewood summer season opened in the Berkshires. The peculiar reality of the BSO’s timeline came into focus: because Nelsons’ tenure runs through the 2027 Tanglewood season, the fired-but-still-contracted music director was scheduled to lead nine BSO programs in the Shed between July 10 and August 2 — conducting, all summer, the orchestra whose board is pushing him out. The red-flower demonstrations that had followed the orchestra to Symphony Hall, Carnegie Hall, and a Boston Pops concert were positioned to continue into the Berkshires.
June 22 — The financial fact-check
The analyst Thomas W. Dinsmore published a detailed rebuttal of the financial claims from Smith’s Berkshire Eagle interview, working from the BSO’s own IRS filings; Slippedisc amplified it under the headline "Boston burns up Chad Smith’s ‘future vision.’"
Dinsmore disputed nearly every figure. On the decline narrative: "The statistics do not show a sustained ‘20-year decline.’ In fact, attendance increased under Andris Nelsons until the COVID lockdowns" — noting total attendance of 182,696 in 2004-05 versus 159,787 in 2023-24, a far gentler slope than Smith’s subscription-only framing. On the orchestra’s solvency, he reported a surplus in 13 of the past 20 years, a cumulative surplus of "$125,944,540," and record FY2024 revenue near $117 million. On the maintenance bill: "Smith repeatedly changes the cost of ‘deferred maintenance,’ but offers no engineering reports or construction estimates." His verdict on the much-invoked vision, left in the comments: "He doesn’t have one."
June 23 — Nelsons is named Conductor of the Year
As Boston worked to move on from him, Andris Nelsons was named Conductor of the Year at Germany’s Opus Klassik awards — one of the recording industry’s most prominent honors (the winners announced June 23; the award presented at the gala in October). The timing crystallized the contrast that had defined the entire saga: the conductor his own board deemed misaligned with the future was, in the judgment of the international music world, among the best alive. Slippedisc summarized Boston’s predicament in a single line: "Can it get much worse for Boston?"
It capped an extraordinary run of affirmation that ran directly counter to the BSO’s case. In February, Nelsons and the BSO had won the Grammy for Best Orchestral Performance — his fourth in that category with the orchestra — for their Deutsche Grammophon recording of Messiaen’s Turangalîla-Symphonie. The Vienna Philharmonic named him an honorary member in May. His other orchestra, the Leipzig Gewandhaus, had already extended his contract to 2032. And the Berlin Philharmonic, Simon Rattle, and the musicians of Chicago and Cleveland had all spoken out in his support that spring.
June 25 — A meeting request, and a dispute over it
Smith and Hostetter emailed every BSO musician requesting an in-person meeting. "We recognize, however, that it is difficult to move forward without addressing the questions many of you still have about the decision not to renew Andris Nelsons," the message read. "We do not take lightly the uncertainty and frustration you and others are feeling." They added that they wanted "to tell our story to the broader community — to our patrons, to our audiences, and to a new generation of Bostonians."
The overture came with no concession on the central demand — reinstatement remained off the table — and its premise was immediately challenged. Dinsmore, citing players, wrote that the suggestion the two had been eager to meet was contradicted by the musicians’ own account: "Smith and Hostetter have not met with the Players Committee, either as individuals or en banc."
Where it stands
June ended as it began: with the board unmoved on the decision, the musicians unconvinced by the explanation, and the public record more contradictory than before. Smith had finally spoken — and in speaking, had confirmed that the firing was deliberate, that he believes it was right, and that he intends to fight for the vision behind it. The orchestra’s own filings, its donors’ behavior, and a music world rallying to Nelsons all pointed the other way.
The next test is the Berkshires. Nelsons takes the Tanglewood podium on July 10, before an audience that has spent four months telling his employer exactly what it thinks. For our reading of what June revealed about the leadership now steering the Boston Symphony, see the companion opinion piece, “Chad Smith Finally Spoke — and Made It Worse.”
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion.